Evaluation capacity assessment worksheet
Assess current capacity across three levels: individuals, organizational systems and culture. Findings provide the starting point for an ECB roadmap.
Evaluation capacity assessment worksheet
Basic information
Enter the organization being assessed and assessment conditions
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
- Organization name
- Community support organization (fictional)
- Assessor
- Internal improvement lead A
- Assessment date
- September 13, 2026
- Assessment purpose
- Embedding regular reflection using records
- Number and positions of participating staff
- Four frontline staff and one manager
Reason for this entry: Limit the assessment scope and purpose.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Enter the organization being assessed and assessment conditions
Limit the assessment scope and purpose.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.
Read the full fictional exampleCurrent individual skills
Rate each skills area (3 = sufficient / 2 = partial / 1 = insufficient)
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Skills area | Current level (1–3) | Evidence and comments | Priority: high / medium / low |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make evaluation questions specific | 2 | Can develop questions in training, but work-related questions are too broad | High |
| Read tables and explain limitations | 1 | Cannot explain denominators that include nonrespondents | High |
| Summarize interviews | 2 | Can organize views but needs practice retaining contrary examples | Medium |
Reason for this entry: In this example, 1 = support needed, 2 = possible with advice, and 3 = can explain independently.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Skills area | Current level (1–3) | Evidence and comments | Priority: high / medium / low |
|---|---|---|---|
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Rate each skills area (3 = sufficient / 2 = partial / 1 = insufficient)
In this example, 1 = support needed, 2 = possible with advice, and 3 = can explain independently.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Keep the information in each row aligned. Scroll wide tables horizontally to see every column.
Read the full fictional exampleCurrent organizational systems
Describe existing evaluation institutions and infrastructure
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| System element | Status (present/partial/absent) | Issues and comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shared record definitions | Partial | Sites count usage differently |
| Meeting time for evaluation | Absent | Reporting items fill the available time |
| Allocated evaluation work time | Absent | Treated as work outside normal duties |
Reason for this entry: Separate individual capability from institutional conditions when examining difficulties.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| System element | Status (present/partial/absent) | Issues and comments |
|---|---|---|
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Describe existing evaluation institutions and infrastructure
Separate individual capability from institutional conditions when examining difficulties.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Keep the information in each row aligned. Scroll wide tables horizontally to see every column.
Read the full fictional exampleCurrent evaluation culture
Describe organizational attitudes and culture toward evaluation in free text
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Reason for this entry: Check conditions for sharing candid information.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Describe organizational attitudes and culture toward evaluation in free text
Check conditions for sharing candid information.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Use the example as a reference and record what you have established about your own program. Distinguish assumptions and unchecked matters from confirmed facts.
Read the full fictional exampleECB priorities and next actions
Enter priority challenges identified through assessment and specific first-year actions
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Priority challenge | Level (individual/system/culture) | Specific action | Person responsible | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared understanding of denominators | Individuals | Exercises reading percentages and missing data using actual anonymized records | Records staff member A | October 2026 |
| Secure reflection time | System | Allocate a 20-minute discussion slot in monthly meetings and staff time | Manager B | October 2026 |
| Turn missed targets into learning | Culture | Bring one difficult result and record improvement options and needed support | Frontline representative C | November 2026 |
Reason for this entry: Assign separate responsibilities for changes in training, systems and dialogue.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Priority challenge | Level (individual/system/culture) | Specific action | Person responsible | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Enter priority challenges identified through assessment and specific first-year actions
Assign separate responsibilities for changes in training, systems and dialogue.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Keep the information in each row aligned. Scroll wide tables horizontally to see every column.
Read the full fictional exampleBefore writing, check when to use the worksheet and what completion involves
Evaluation capacity assessment worksheet is a worksheet for applying Evaluation Capacity Building in meetings or individual work. For the overall duration of the method, use “Illustrative estimate (adjust for scale and team): several years (involving changes to organizational culture and systems)” as a reference, adjusting for scale and resources. Fill in what you know provisionally and leave unresolved matters as questions to check next.
When this worksheet is useful
- When reducing excessive dependence on external experts due to limited internal evaluation expertise
- When evaluation remains a formal reporting obligation rather than supporting learning and improvement
- When developing or strengthening institutional infrastructure such as evaluation policies and SOPs
Participants and preparation
Executives demonstrate commitment, evaluation departments lead implementation, and all managers support cultural change. External ECB facilitators often support initial stages.
Bring the materials used for decisions, existing data, and differing stakeholder views to help complete the worksheet.
Suggested order
- 1. Basic informationEnter the organization being assessed and assessment conditions
- 2. Current individual skillsRate each skills area (3 = sufficient / 2 = partial / 1 = insufficient)
- 3. Current organizational systemsDescribe existing evaluation institutions and infrastructure
- 4. Current evaluation cultureDescribe organizational attitudes and culture toward evaluation in free text
- 5. ECB priorities and next actionsEnter priority challenges identified through assessment and specific first-year actions
Signs the worksheet is ready for review
- ECB assessment report
- ECB roadmap and strategic plan
- Training program package
Cautions for review
- Assuming training alone completes capacity building. Also examine roles, time, information and decision-making arrangements for actual use.
- Assigning responsibility solely to the evaluation department without organization-wide commitment
- Copying a model organization's practices wholesale without diagnosis. Differences in culture, scale and resources require examination of fit.
Read a completed fictional example (your entries will not change)
The following is a fictional example for illustration. A support organization examines why records are collected but not used in meetings.
Basic information
- Organization name
- Community support organization (fictional)
- Assessor
- Internal improvement lead A
- Assessment date
- September 13, 2026
- Assessment purpose
- Embedding regular reflection using records
- Number and positions of participating staff
- Four frontline staff and one manager
Reason for this entry: Limit the assessment scope and purpose.
Current individual skills
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Skills area | Current level (1–3) | Evidence and comments | Priority: high / medium / low |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make evaluation questions specific | 2 | Can develop questions in training, but work-related questions are too broad | High |
| Read tables and explain limitations | 1 | Cannot explain denominators that include nonrespondents | High |
| Summarize interviews | 2 | Can organize views but needs practice retaining contrary examples | Medium |
Reason for this entry: In this example, 1 = support needed, 2 = possible with advice, and 3 = can explain independently.
Current organizational systems
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| System element | Status (present/partial/absent) | Issues and comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shared record definitions | Partial | Sites count usage differently |
| Meeting time for evaluation | Absent | Reporting items fill the available time |
| Allocated evaluation work time | Absent | Treated as work outside normal duties |
Reason for this entry: Separate individual capability from institutional conditions when examining difficulties.
Current evaluation culture
Reason for this entry: Check conditions for sharing candid information.
ECB priorities and next actions
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Priority challenge | Level (individual/system/culture) | Specific action | Person responsible | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared understanding of denominators | Individuals | Exercises reading percentages and missing data using actual anonymized records | Records staff member A | October 2026 |
| Secure reflection time | System | Allocate a 20-minute discussion slot in monthly meetings and staff time | Manager B | October 2026 |
| Turn missed targets into learning | Culture | Bring one difficult result and record improvement options and needed support | Frontline representative C | November 2026 |
Reason for this entry: Assign separate responsibilities for changes in training, systems and dialogue.
Common errors in judgment
Treat training attendance as evidence of improved capability
How to revise: Check whether staff can use practical questions and records
Reason: Participation volume and workplace capability differ.
Centralize all analysis in one evaluation officer
How to revise: Provide roles and time for frontline staff and managers too
Reason: This prevents the evaluation function from disappearing when one person transfers.
References and checked sections
- A Checklist for Building Organizational Evaluation CapacityBoris B. Volkov and Jean A. King · 2007
- Section consulted
- Organizational Context, p. 1; ECB Structures, pp. 2–3
- How it relates to the text
- Provide organizational structures, roles, time, records and information-sharing arrangements alongside training.
How to cite this page
Change history
- — Updated explanations to correspond with sources, and added method-specific fictional worksheet examples, judgment examples and revision history.


