Interrupted time-series design and diagnostics worksheet
Credibility depends on pre-data volume and absence of concurrent external factors. Check assumptions before design.
Interrupted time-series design and diagnostics worksheet
Basic information
Enter evaluation basics
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
- Policy/program name
- Booking system introduction
- Analyst
- Analyst A (fictional)
- Data sources
- Monthly registration records (fictional)
- Creation date
- July 1, 2026 (fictional)
Reason for this entry: Record start time.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Enter evaluation basics
Record start time.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.
Read the full fictional exampleCheck time-series data
Check dataset structure
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
- Outcome and units
- Mean waiting time in minutes
- Monthly / quarterly / annual units
- Monthly
- Pre-intervention timepoint count
- Plan 24 pre-timepoints
- Post-intervention timepoint count
- Plan 12 post-timepoints
- Exact intervention year/month
- April 2026 (fictional)
Reason for this entry: Assumed seasonality coverage, not universal required counts.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Check dataset structure
Assumed seasonality coverage, not universal required counts.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.
Read the full fictional exampleExternal factors
List possible concurrent policies and external shocks
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Reason for this entry: Track structural changes beyond policy.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
List possible concurrent policies and external shocks
Track structural changes beyond policy.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Use the example as a reference and record what you have established about your own program. Distinguish assumptions and unchecked matters from confirmed facts.
Read the full fictional exampleConsider comparison groups
Enter comparison areas/groups' availability and rationale
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Reason for this entry: Assess comparison-series validity.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Enter comparison areas/groups' availability and rationale
Assess comparison-series validity.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Use the example as a reference and record what you have established about your own program. Distinguish assumptions and unchecked matters from confirmed facts.
Read the full fictional exampleAnalysis checklist
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
- ☐ Not checked: Assessed pre/post counts against variability, seasonality, dependence and precision
- ☐ Not checked: Checked concurrent policy changes or recorded influences
- ☐ Not checked: Checked ACF and Durbin-Watson autocorrelation
- ☐ Not checked: Checked seasonality and adjusted if needed
- ☐ Not checked: Plotted pre/post changes
- ☑ Checked: Explicitly plotted extrapolated counterfactual
- ☐ Not checked: Conducted controlled ITS where data available
Reason for this entry: An illustration showing a counterfactual formula. Acquisition and diagnostics are undone; 8 timepoints are not universally sufficient.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
An illustration showing a counterfactual formula. Acquisition and diagnostics are undone; 8 timepoints are not universally sufficient.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Read each item and check those you have confirmed. Do not use the fictional example’s checkbox states as findings about your own program.
Read the full fictional exampleBefore writing, check when to use the worksheet and what completion involves
Interrupted time-series design and diagnostics worksheet is a worksheet for applying Interrupted Time Series Analysis in meetings or individual work. For the overall duration of the method, use “Illustrative planning durations, not common standards: collection 1–4 weeks, analysis 1–2 weeks” as a reference, adjusting for scale and resources. Fill in what you know provisionally and leave unresolved matters as questions to check next.
When this worksheet is useful
- Monthly/annual administrative, disease or crime series around law, policy or program changes
- Nationwide or whole-area policies without easy controls but with long series
- Health/public-health effects of drug approvals, infection measures or screening using aggregates
Participants and preparation
1–2 evaluators/statisticians using R or similar software, securing data with administrative statistics staff
Bring the materials used for decisions, existing data, and differing stakeholder views to help complete the worksheet.
Suggested order
- 1. Basic informationEnter evaluation basics
- 2. Check time-series dataCheck dataset structure
- 3. External factorsList possible concurrent policies and external shocks
- 4. Consider comparison groupsEnter comparison areas/groups' availability and rationale
- 5. Analysis checklist
Signs the worksheet is ready for review
- Time-series plot: observations, fitted and counterfactual lines
- Segmented coefficients with level/slope changes and intervals
- Autocorrelation diagnostics: ACF and DW
Cautions for review
- Do not use timepoint count alone as pass/fail. Length depends on variability, seasonality, dependence, effect shape and precision.
- Ignoring dependence or distributions misestimates uncertainty. Use diagnostics and suitable models.
- Distinguish seasonality from intervention changes; explain intervals, cycles, periods and adjustment.
Read a completed fictional example (your entries will not change)
A fictional model: pre-waiting is 100−t minutes; introduction at t=12 gives immediate −8 minutes and additional slope −0.5 minutes/month.
Basic information
- Policy/program name
- Booking system introduction
- Analyst
- Analyst A (fictional)
- Data sources
- Monthly registration records (fictional)
- Creation date
- July 1, 2026 (fictional)
Reason for this entry: Record start time.
Check time-series data
- Outcome and units
- Mean waiting time in minutes
- Monthly / quarterly / annual units
- Monthly
- Pre-intervention timepoint count
- Plan 24 pre-timepoints
- Post-intervention timepoint count
- Plan 12 post-timepoints
- Exact intervention year/month
- April 2026 (fictional)
Reason for this entry: Assumed seasonality coverage, not universal required counts.
External factors
Reason for this entry: Track structural changes beyond policy.
Consider comparison groups
Reason for this entry: Assess comparison-series validity.
Analysis checklist
- ☐ Not checked: Assessed pre/post counts against variability, seasonality, dependence and precision
- ☐ Not checked: Checked concurrent policy changes or recorded influences
- ☐ Not checked: Checked ACF and Durbin-Watson autocorrelation
- ☐ Not checked: Checked seasonality and adjusted if needed
- ☐ Not checked: Plotted pre/post changes
- ☑ Checked: Explicitly plotted extrapolated counterfactual
- ☐ Not checked: Conducted controlled ITS where data available
Reason for this entry: An illustration showing a counterfactual formula. Acquisition and diagnostics are undone; 8 timepoints are not universally sufficient.
Common errors in judgment
Compare only immediately adjacent months
How to revise: Examine trends/seasonality over sufficient before/after series
Reason: Temporary fluctuations are easily mistaken for effects.
Assume more timepoints resolve concurrent policies
How to revise: Record concurrent changes and consider comparison series/evidence
Reason: Simultaneous factors cannot be separated by count alone.
References and checked sections
- Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorialJames Lopez Bernal, Steven Cummins, and Antonio Gasparrini · 2017
- Section consulted
- The interrupted time series design / Step 4: regression analysis
- How it relates to the text
- Predefine effect shapes and examine autocorrelation, seasonality and time-varying confounding.
How to cite this page
Change history
- — Checked sources for definitions and conditions and added fictional examples, judgment rationales and completed entries for every field. Revised unsupported historical or uptake claims. Reviewed procedures and cautions, adjusting fixed counts, thresholds and institutional generalizations. Preserved field positions, types and counts while revising fixed conditions and thresholds.


