Recommendation response table (management response template)

Copy all report recommendations into this worksheet and enter the organization's position, response plan, responsible person and deadline for each. Submit after management approval.

When to use this worksheet and what completion involves Fictional completed example

EvalCompass Worksheet

Recommendation response table (management response template)

Method: Management Response

Copy all report recommendations into this worksheet and enter the organization's position, response plan, responsible person and deadline for each. Submit after management approval.

Basic information

Enter basic information on the evaluation

Completed example for this section (fictional)

This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.

Evaluation name: Operational evaluation of community consultation sessions (fictional)
Evaluation report publication date: October 10, 2026
Person responsible for preparing the management response: Operations representative C
Date prepared: October 20, 2026
Submission recipient (e.g., evaluation committee): Management meeting

Reason for this entry: Match report and response versions.

Evaluation name

Evaluation report publication date

Person responsible for preparing the management response

Date prepared

Submission recipient (e.g., evaluation committee)

Writing tips and explanation for this section

About this section

Enter basic information on the evaluation

Match report and response versions.

View the method explanation

Writing tips

Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.

Read the full fictional example

Recommendation response table

Enter recommendations in report number order. Choose Accepted / Partially accepted / Rejected in the position field.

Completed example for this section (fictional)

This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.

Scroll horizontally to view the table

Recommendation number	Recommendation summary	Position (accepted/partially accepted/rejected)	Reasons and additional notes	Specific action	Responsible department and person	Planned completion deadline
R1	Provide reception assistance at every session	Partially accepted	Funding for permanent additional staff is unavailable	Pilot assistance twice during busy periods and review waiting times	Venue staff member B	November 30, 2026
R2	Record reception times consistently	Accepted	Needed for comparison before and after improvements	Standardize record field definitions and explain them to all staff	Records staff member A	October 31, 2026

Reason for this entry: Link the degree of acceptance to specific implementation.

Scroll horizontally to view the table

Recommendation number	Recommendation summary	Position (accepted/partially accepted/rejected)	Reasons and additional notes	Specific action	Responsible department and person	Planned completion deadline

Writing tips and explanation for this section

About this section

Enter recommendations in report number order. Choose Accepted / Partially accepted / Rejected in the position field.

Link the degree of acceptance to specific implementation.

View the method explanation

Writing tips

Keep the information in each row aligned. Scroll wide tables horizontally to see every column.

Read the full fictional example

Explanation of disagreement

Transparently describe reasons for rejected or partially accepted recommendations, such as authority, resources or technical constraints

Completed example for this section (fictional)

This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.

No recommendation is fully rejected. Permanent staffing under R1 is not accepted; the November pilot will establish required hours and costs for reconsideration in December.

Reason for this entry: Explain what remains on hold under partial acceptance.

Writing tips and explanation for this section

About this section

Transparently describe reasons for rejected or partially accepted recommendations, such as authority, resources or technical constraints

Explain what remains on hold under partial acceptance.

View the method explanation

Writing tips

Use the example as a reference and record what you have established about your own program. Distinguish assumptions and unchecked matters from confirmed facts.

Read the full fictional example

Follow-up tracking plan

Enter when, by whom and how progress will be checked

Completed example for this section (fictional)

This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.

First planned progress review date: November 15, 2026
Second planned progress review date: December 10, 2026
Progress management lead: Records staff member A
Planned final completion check date: December 10, 2026 (reset deadline if incomplete)

Reason for this entry: Separate interim and completion checks.

First planned progress review date

Second planned progress review date

Progress management lead

Planned final completion check date

Writing tips and explanation for this section

About this section

Enter when, by whom and how progress will be checked

Separate interim and completion checks.

View the method explanation

Writing tips

Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.

Read the full fictional example

Approval

Approve the management response as a whole

Completed example for this section (fictional)

This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.

Approver's name and position: Operations meeting chair D (fictional approver)
Approval date: October 20, 2026 (fictional)
Recipient and deadline for next follow-up report: Operations meeting / December 10, 2026

Reason for this entry: This fictional example illustrates the form; it is not a record of actual approval.

Approver's name and position

Approval date

Recipient and deadline for next follow-up report

Writing tips and explanation for this section

About this section

Approve the management response as a whole

This fictional example illustrates the form; it is not a record of actual approval.

View the method explanation

Writing tips

Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.

Read the full fictional example

Before writing, check when to use the worksheet and what completion involves

Recommendation response table (management response template) is a worksheet for applying Management Response in meetings or individual work. For the overall duration of the method, use “Illustrative estimate (adjust for scale and team): initial response: 2–4 weeks / follow-up tracking: 1–3 years after evaluation” as a reference, adjusting for scale and resources. Fill in what you know provisionally and leave unresolved matters as questions to check next.

When this worksheet is useful

When receiving an evaluation report and preparing an organizational response and action plan for recommendations
When an official accountability response to an external or third-party evaluation is required
When establishing organization-wide arrangements to track and manage recommendation implementation

Participants and preparation

Management of the evaluated program, such as bureau or section heads, responsible departments, and evaluation or planning departments for coordination. Consider approval at chief executive or board chair level when submitting to an external evaluation committee.

Bring the materials used for decisions, existing data, and differing stakeholder views to help complete the worksheet.

Suggested order

1. Basic informationEnter basic information on the evaluation
2. Recommendation response tableEnter recommendations in report number order. Choose Accepted / Partially accepted / Rejected in the position field.
3. Explanation of disagreementTransparently describe reasons for rejected or partially accepted recommendations, such as authority, resources or technical constraints
4. Follow-up tracking planEnter when, by whom and how progress will be checked
5. ApprovalApprove the management response as a whole

Signs the worksheet is ready for review

Management response document (recommendation response table)
Action plan (with responsible people and deadlines)
Progress tracking register

Cautions for review

Expressing acceptance while action plans remain too abstract to implement. Named responsible people and deadlines are essential.
Stating only “rejected” without reasons. Transparent reasons for disagreement strengthen credibility.
Submitting the management response and abandoning follow-up tracking

Guides to read before starting

Read a completed fictional example (your entries will not change)

Fictional example; not actual results

The following is a fictional example for illustration. A community consultation operations meeting decides responses to two recommendations.

Basic information

Evaluation name: Operational evaluation of community consultation sessions (fictional)
Evaluation report publication date: October 10, 2026
Person responsible for preparing the management response: Operations representative C
Date prepared: October 20, 2026
Submission recipient (e.g., evaluation committee): Management meeting

Reason for this entry: Match report and response versions.

Recommendation response table

Scroll horizontally to view the table

Recommendation number	Recommendation summary	Position (accepted/partially accepted/rejected)	Reasons and additional notes	Specific action	Responsible department and person	Planned completion deadline
R1	Provide reception assistance at every session	Partially accepted	Funding for permanent additional staff is unavailable	Pilot assistance twice during busy periods and review waiting times	Venue staff member B	November 30, 2026
R2	Record reception times consistently	Accepted	Needed for comparison before and after improvements	Standardize record field definitions and explain them to all staff	Records staff member A	October 31, 2026

Reason for this entry: Link the degree of acceptance to specific implementation.

Explanation of disagreement

No recommendation is fully rejected. Permanent staffing under R1 is not accepted; the November pilot will establish required hours and costs for reconsideration in December.

Reason for this entry: Explain what remains on hold under partial acceptance.

Follow-up tracking plan

First planned progress review date: November 15, 2026
Second planned progress review date: December 10, 2026
Progress management lead: Records staff member A
Planned final completion check date: December 10, 2026 (reset deadline if incomplete)

Reason for this entry: Separate interim and completion checks.

Approval

Approver's name and position: Operations meeting chair D (fictional approver)
Approval date: October 20, 2026 (fictional)
Recipient and deadline for next follow-up report: Operations meeting / December 10, 2026

Reason for this entry: This fictional example illustrates the form; it is not a record of actual approval.

Common errors in judgment

Mark all recommendations accepted and treat the response as complete

How to revise: Specify actions, responsible people, deadlines and completion evidence

Reason: Agreement and implementation are different states.

Delete rejected recommendations from the report

How to revise: Retain evaluation recommendations and explain disagreement in the response

Reason: This makes both evaluation and organizational decision-making traceable.

Editorial and checking information

Content updated: 2026-09-13Source checked: 2026-09-13 (includes AI cross-checking)No documented human reviewIncludes fictional examplesEditorial policy and scope of checking Cite this page Report a correction

References and checked sections

Management Response to Independent Strategic and Corporate Programme Evaluations
United Nations Development Programme
Section consulted
Key issues and recommendations; Key actions; Implementation of the actions
How it relates to the text
Link views on recommendations to actions, deadlines, responsibilities and implementation tracking.
Source checked: 2026-09-13 (includes AI cross-checking)

How to cite this page

EvalCompass Editorial Team. “Recommendation response table (management response template)”. EvalCompass, updated 2026-09-13. https://evalcompass.jun-nakatani.com/en/worksheets/management-response/

Add the date you accessed the page. Text created by this site is available under CC BY 4.0. Quotations, external materials, and bundled fonts have their own terms of use. When reusing content, credit the source, link to the license, and indicate any changes.

Suggest a correction or improvement to this page

Change history

2026-09-13 — Updated explanations to correspond with sources, and added method-specific fictional worksheet examples, judgment examples and revision history.