Outcome mapping progress marker worksheet
Develop progress markers from desired boundary partner behavior. Stages express deepening change. Do not use timing fields to impose fixed deadlines; record checking frequency where appropriate.
Outcome mapping progress marker worksheet
Basic information
Basic program and boundary partner information
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
- Program name
- Improve consultation coordination (fictional)
- Boundary partner name and type
- Desk B, a directly collaborating local agency
- Period covered
- Fiscal year 2026
- Date and author
- September 13, 2026 / coordination staff
Reason for this entry: Identify whose change to track.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Basic program and boundary partner information
Identify whose change to track.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Follow each field’s heading to record the program name, focus, period, and other details. Leave undecided matters clearly marked as unresolved.
Read the full fictional exampleOutcome challenge
Describe ideal behavioral changes expected of this boundary partner in behavior, relationships, activities or policies, not knowledge or attitudes.
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Reason for this entry: Record partner behavior rather than program implementation plans.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Describe ideal behavioral changes expected of this boundary partner in behavior, relationships, activities or policies, not knowledge or attitudes.
Record partner behavior rather than program implementation plans.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Use the example as a reference and record what you have established about your own program. Distinguish assumptions and unchecked matters from confirmed facts.
Read the full fictional exampleProgress markers
Specify markers at 3 levels. Write each as “The boundary partner does...” or “becomes...”
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Stage | Specific behavioral progress marker | Indicative achievement timing | Monitoring method |
|---|---|---|---|
| expect to see | B participates in reflecting on interrupted referrals. | Check monthly without a fixed deadline. | Meeting records and B's account |
| like to see | B incorporates advance contact into procedures and proposes improvements. | Examine as deepening change. | Revised procedures and proposal records |
| love to see | B independently shares learning with another desk. | Do not impose an achievement deadline. | Records of sharing organized by B |
Reason for this entry: Use the original form's timing field for checking frequency rather than imposed deadlines.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Stage | Specific behavioral progress marker | Indicative achievement timing | Monitoring method |
|---|---|---|---|
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Specify markers at 3 levels. Write each as “The boundary partner does...” or “becomes...”
Use the original form's timing field for checking frequency rather than imposed deadlines.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Keep the information in each row aligned. Scroll wide tables horizontally to see every column.
Read the full fictional exampleMonitoring record
Record each marker's progress during periodic reviews, such as quarterly.
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Record date | Achievements or changes, including evidence | Notes and issues |
|---|---|---|
| End of September 2026 | B brought an interrupted referral case and proposed consent-checking methods, fictional minutes. | Independent sharing with other organizations has not yet been confirmed. |
Reason for this entry: Distinguish progress from unobserved behavior.
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Record date | Achievements or changes, including evidence | Notes and issues |
|---|---|---|
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
Record each marker's progress during periodic reviews, such as quarterly.
Distinguish progress from unobserved behavior.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Keep the information in each row aligned. Scroll wide tables horizontally to see every column.
Read the full fictional exampleProgress marker quality check
Completed example for this section (fictional)
This fictional example is for explanation. Adapt it to your own program. Your entries will not change.
- ☑ Checked: Expect to see describes foundational behavioral change desired at a minimum
- ☑ Checked: Love to see describes ideal or innovative change, not activities
- ☑ Checked: All markers describe boundary partner behavior, not program activities
- ☑ Checked: Monitoring methods are feasible
Reason for this entry: This design example describes B's behavior throughout.
Writing tips and explanation for this section
About this section
This design example describes B's behavior throughout.
View the method explanationWriting tips
Read each item and check those you have confirmed. Do not use the fictional example’s checkbox states as findings about your own program.
Read the full fictional exampleBefore writing, check when to use the worksheet and what completion involves
Outcome mapping progress marker worksheet is a worksheet for applying Outcome Mapping in meetings or individual work. For the overall duration of the method, use “Illustrative estimate, adjusted to scale and staffing: 2–3 days for a design workshop plus monitoring throughout the program” as a reference, adjusting for scale and resources. Fill in what you know provisionally and leave unresolved matters as questions to check next.
When this worksheet is useful
- When pursuing long-term social change for which the program cannot take direct responsibility for impact
- When monitoring behavioral changes among particular partners, such as government agencies, community organizations or researchers
- When building theory with stakeholder participation from program design and integrating an evaluation framework
Participants and preparation
All program staff during design, boundary partner representatives where possible, and 1 external facilitator. 10–20 participants in the design workshop.
Bring the materials used for decisions, existing data, and differing stakeholder views to help complete the worksheet.
Suggested order
- 1. Basic informationBasic program and boundary partner information
- 2. Outcome challengeDescribe ideal behavioral changes expected of this boundary partner in behavior, relationships, activities or policies, not knowledge or attitudes.
- 3. Progress markersSpecify markers at 3 levels. Write each as “The boundary partner does...” or “becomes...”
- 4. Monitoring recordRecord each marker's progress during periodic reviews, such as quarterly.
- 5. Progress marker quality check
Signs the worksheet is ready for review
- Outcome challenges
- Progress marker register by boundary partner
- Outcome journal: ongoing records
Cautions for review
- Writing progress markers as activity lists. Always describe behavioral change in terms of what boundary partners do or become.
- Listing too many partners makes recording unsustainable. Define tracking scope according to direct relationships and intended evaluation use.
- Failing to monitor and update after design leaves an impressive document unusable for evaluation.
Read a completed fictional example (your entries will not change)
A fictional illustrative example in which a consultation support organization tracks referral practice changes at directly collaborating desk B.
Basic information
- Program name
- Improve consultation coordination (fictional)
- Boundary partner name and type
- Desk B, a directly collaborating local agency
- Period covered
- Fiscal year 2026
- Date and author
- September 13, 2026 / coordination staff
Reason for this entry: Identify whose change to track.
Outcome challenge
Reason for this entry: Record partner behavior rather than program implementation plans.
Progress markers
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Stage | Specific behavioral progress marker | Indicative achievement timing | Monitoring method |
|---|---|---|---|
| expect to see | B participates in reflecting on interrupted referrals. | Check monthly without a fixed deadline. | Meeting records and B's account |
| like to see | B incorporates advance contact into procedures and proposes improvements. | Examine as deepening change. | Revised procedures and proposal records |
| love to see | B independently shares learning with another desk. | Do not impose an achievement deadline. | Records of sharing organized by B |
Reason for this entry: Use the original form's timing field for checking frequency rather than imposed deadlines.
Monitoring record
Scroll horizontally to view the table
| Record date | Achievements or changes, including evidence | Notes and issues |
|---|---|---|
| End of September 2026 | B brought an interrupted referral case and proposed consent-checking methods, fictional minutes. | Independent sharing with other organizations has not yet been confirmed. |
Reason for this entry: Distinguish progress from unobserved behavior.
Progress marker quality check
- ☑ Checked: Expect to see describes foundational behavioral change desired at a minimum
- ☑ Checked: Love to see describes ideal or innovative change, not activities
- ☑ Checked: All markers describe boundary partner behavior, not program activities
- ☑ Checked: Monitoring methods are feasible
Reason for this entry: This design example describes B's behavior throughout.
Common errors in judgment
Writing a marker as “The organization conducts 3 training sessions”
How to revise: Describe what partners do after training.
Reason: Partners' changes are central to monitoring.
Replacing 3 stages with compulsory short-, medium- and long-term deadlines
How to revise: Treat stages as deepening from expected responses to self-directed change.
Reason: Timing alone cannot represent the quality of behavioral change.
References and checked sections
- Outcome MappingBetterEvaluation
- Section consulted
- Key concepts in Outcome Mapping; Intentional design; Outcome and performance monitoring
- How it relates to the text
- Progress markers describe developments in partners' behavior, distinct from fixed percentage or deadline indicators.
How to cite this page
Change history
- — Updated explanations to correspond with sources, and added method-specific fictional worksheet examples, judgment examples and revision history.
- — Made minimal corrections to assertions, fixed conditions or inconsistencies between worksheets and examples based on content check FW-01. Preserved field counts, order, labels and section structure. Did not change verification status of unchecked material.


