Calculate a ratio with visible adjustments and assumptions
A fictional example for illustration: a calculation exercise using a fictional 1-year program. Financial proxies and adjustment rates are not recommended real-world values.
| Calculation component | Illustrative setting | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Value before adjustment | 20 cases × 100,000 yen | 2 million yen |
| Change occurring anyway and others' contributions | Deduct 20% and 25% sequentially; assume no displacement | 2 million yen × 0.8 × 0.75 = 1.2 million yen |
| Discounting | All value is in the current period; no future value | Present value: 1.2 million yen |
| Ratio | Inputs: 1 million yen | 120÷100=1.2:1 |
| Sensitivity analysis | Change only the proxy from 100,000 to 80,000 yen | 96÷100=0.96:1 |
What this example supports
Do not emphasize the 1.2 result alone: changing the proxy assumption alone takes the ratio below 1. Also report significant unmonetized changes and insufficient evidence for the no-displacement assumption.
Common errors in judgment
Select only monetizable outcomes to show a high ratio
How to revise: Identify important changes first and record exclusions and reasons
Reason: This avoids overvaluation through selective inclusion of value.
Rank organizations directly by their SROI ratios
How to revise: Check comparability of target groups, periods, proxies and adjustments
Reason: The same ratio label can conceal different scopes and assumptions.
Put it into practice next
Use the SROI worksheet to check proxy evidence and adjustment rates for each outcome
Frequently asked questions
Does a high SROI mean a good program?
Not necessarily. Values change with assumptions and valuation methods, so examine outcome quality, evidence and limitations as well as ratios.
Can small nonprofits use SROI?
Consider whether the burden is justified by the purpose. If only outcomes are organized or partly monetized, state that scope and do not report the result as a ratio based on the complete SROI procedure.
How does SROI differ from cost-benefit analysis?
Both monetize value, but SROI particularly emphasizes stakeholder changes and explanations of social value.
References and checked sections
- A guide to Social Return on InvestmentThe SROI Network / Social Value International · 2012
- Section consulted
- Stage 4 Establishing impact / Stage 5 Calculating the SROI / Resources 1 (reporting items)
- How it relates to the text
- Monetary valuation of change, adjustment for other factors, ratios and sensitivity analysis
- Standards for Applying the Principles of Social Value: The Complete SetSocial Value International · 2026
- Section consulted
- Section Three, p.30 (report types) / Part B, p.33, item 8 (optional ratio disclosure)
- How it relates to the text
- Distinguishing disclosure scope in SROI reporting and organizational social value reporting
How to cite this page
Change history
- — A cross-guide review clarified indicator formats, outcome classifications and causal judgments, interpretation of tables, and the scope of SVI2026 where relevant.
- — Added correspondence between claims and original sources, fictional completed examples, judgment corrections and links to next tasks. Revised unverified generalizations.





